JAMES MCDONALD FROM FORFAR SENTENCED FOR SEX OFFENCES AGAINST YOUNG BOYS IN ANGUS
| Red Rose Database
Forfar Sexual Abuser
In June 2016, a man from Forfar named James McDonald was formally sentenced and placed on the sex offenders register for a period of three years following serious allegations involving two young boys in the town of Forfar, located within the region of Angus. The case drew significant attention due to the nature of the offences and the circumstances surrounding the incidents.
McDonald, aged 32 at the time, was found guilty of engaging in inappropriate and indecent communications with two minors, as well as breaching the peace on multiple occasions between August and December of the previous year. The offences took place at his residence on Lily Wynd, a street within Forfar. The court proceedings revealed disturbing details about McDonald's conduct, which included actions that caused fear and distress among the young victims.
According to court reports, one of the victims, a 12-year-old boy, witnessed McDonald standing at a window in his underpants, making sexually suggestive gestures that frightened him. The young boy was reportedly alarmed by McDonald's behaviour, which involved the man standing at the window and gesticulating in a sexual manner. Later, the same boy saw McDonald making hand signals and beckoning him towards the house, further escalating the distress caused by McDonald's actions.
In a separate incident in December, McDonald held up a rude sign and opened his door to a 13-year-old boy, whispering to him in a manner that implied an invitation to come inside. The 13-year-old, distressed by the encounter, quickly ran away from the scene, prompting the police to be called to investigate the matter. These incidents highlighted a pattern of inappropriate behaviour directed at minors, which led to the court's intervention.
Initially, the sentencing was delayed to assess McDonald's mental fitness to stand trial. A psychologist examined him and confirmed that he was capable of understanding the proceedings. During the court hearing, McDonald's solicitor, John Hall, stated that his client was aware of how close he had come to facing imprisonment. McDonald himself acknowledged the gravity of his actions and the potential consequences.
As part of his sentence, McDonald was ordered to register as a sex offender for three years. Additionally, he was placed under a Community Payback Order, which mandated him to undergo specialised treatment and prohibited him from having any contact with individuals under the age of 16. The order also requires McDonald to appear before the court every two months for progress reviews, ensuring ongoing supervision and compliance.
Mr. Hall emphasized that the court's decision to avoid a custodial sentence was influenced by McDonald's vulnerability, suggesting that imprisonment would be detrimental to his well-being. He remarked, “By keeping the hand of the court above him it will not be lost on him that he has escaped a custodial sentence. He would be an extremely vulnerable person in a prison setting.”
Sheriff Jack Brown addressed McDonald directly, stating, “This is a case in which you have come very close to being sent to custody and part of the reason for that is you do not appear to have properly grasped the consequences of your actions and the potential ramifications.” The court's decision reflects a focus on rehabilitation and monitoring, aiming to prevent any future offences and protect the community from further harm.
McDonald, aged 32 at the time, was found guilty of engaging in inappropriate and indecent communications with two minors, as well as breaching the peace on multiple occasions between August and December of the previous year. The offences took place at his residence on Lily Wynd, a street within Forfar. The court proceedings revealed disturbing details about McDonald's conduct, which included actions that caused fear and distress among the young victims.
According to court reports, one of the victims, a 12-year-old boy, witnessed McDonald standing at a window in his underpants, making sexually suggestive gestures that frightened him. The young boy was reportedly alarmed by McDonald's behaviour, which involved the man standing at the window and gesticulating in a sexual manner. Later, the same boy saw McDonald making hand signals and beckoning him towards the house, further escalating the distress caused by McDonald's actions.
In a separate incident in December, McDonald held up a rude sign and opened his door to a 13-year-old boy, whispering to him in a manner that implied an invitation to come inside. The 13-year-old, distressed by the encounter, quickly ran away from the scene, prompting the police to be called to investigate the matter. These incidents highlighted a pattern of inappropriate behaviour directed at minors, which led to the court's intervention.
Initially, the sentencing was delayed to assess McDonald's mental fitness to stand trial. A psychologist examined him and confirmed that he was capable of understanding the proceedings. During the court hearing, McDonald's solicitor, John Hall, stated that his client was aware of how close he had come to facing imprisonment. McDonald himself acknowledged the gravity of his actions and the potential consequences.
As part of his sentence, McDonald was ordered to register as a sex offender for three years. Additionally, he was placed under a Community Payback Order, which mandated him to undergo specialised treatment and prohibited him from having any contact with individuals under the age of 16. The order also requires McDonald to appear before the court every two months for progress reviews, ensuring ongoing supervision and compliance.
Mr. Hall emphasized that the court's decision to avoid a custodial sentence was influenced by McDonald's vulnerability, suggesting that imprisonment would be detrimental to his well-being. He remarked, “By keeping the hand of the court above him it will not be lost on him that he has escaped a custodial sentence. He would be an extremely vulnerable person in a prison setting.”
Sheriff Jack Brown addressed McDonald directly, stating, “This is a case in which you have come very close to being sent to custody and part of the reason for that is you do not appear to have properly grasped the consequences of your actions and the potential ramifications.” The court's decision reflects a focus on rehabilitation and monitoring, aiming to prevent any future offences and protect the community from further harm.