JACK HOULTON FROM ROTHERHAM THREATENS 15-YEAR-OLD GIRL WITH NUDES IN SHOCKING CASE
| Red Rose Database
Rotherham Child Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has shocked the community of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, a 22-year-old man named Jack Houlton was brought before Sheffield Crown Court on serious allegations involving a minor. The case centers around Houlton's inappropriate and illegal conduct towards a 15-year-old girl, with whom he had a sexual relationship that lasted for approximately eight months.
According to court proceedings, Houlton had taken explicit photographs of the girl using his mobile phone. These images, which depicted her in a nude state, became a source of concern when Houlton threatened to distribute them. He reportedly told the girl that he intended to show the photographs to her school friends and even post them on her Facebook profile after their relationship ended. This threat caused significant distress to the young girl, prompting her to seek help from the police.
Fiona Swain, the prosecutor, outlined the details of the case, emphasizing that Houlton was fully aware of the girl’s age when their relationship began. She stated that Houlton knew she was only 15 years old and that they had engaged in sexual activity shortly after they started dating. The prosecutor highlighted that Houlton’s actions were knowingly illegal, and he was aware that his conduct was wrong.
Houlton admitted to police that he had taken several photographs of his underage girlfriend but claimed that he only saved two of these images. When questioned about his threats to post the images online or share them with her friends, Houlton insisted that his comments were meant as a joke. However, he did acknowledge that he had threatened to spread the images around her school, which added to the severity of the case.
Houlton, who resides on Lister Avenue in Rawmarsh, Rotherham, has a criminal history that includes convictions for possessing an imitation firearm and burglary. He has previously served four custodial sentences, indicating a pattern of criminal behavior. During the hearing, he pleaded guilty to three counts of engaging in sexual activity with a child and one count of distributing indecent images.
Defense lawyer Dermot Hughes argued that the relationship was consensual and that the girl had never expressed any complaints about their interactions. He also claimed that Houlton had no intention of actually distributing the images, asserting that they were posed at the girl’s request and that there was no malicious intent.
However, the presiding judge, Alan Goldsack, was not convinced by these arguments. He sentenced Houlton to 16 months in prison, emphasizing the gravity of his actions. Judge Goldsack stated, “You knew perfectly well that having sex with a girl under 16 was against the law. The law is there to protect young girls from themselves as well as young men.”
He further added, “You took photos of her on your phone, and it was the fact she discovered you were thinking of distributing them on Facebook or to schoolfriends that caused her to put the matter in the hands of the police, indicating perhaps where her priorities lie.”
In addition to his prison sentence, Houlton was subjected to a Sex Offenders Prevention Order, which prohibits him from contacting the girl or engaging in any further inappropriate conduct involving minors. The case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of safeguarding young individuals from exploitation and the legal consequences of such actions.
According to court proceedings, Houlton had taken explicit photographs of the girl using his mobile phone. These images, which depicted her in a nude state, became a source of concern when Houlton threatened to distribute them. He reportedly told the girl that he intended to show the photographs to her school friends and even post them on her Facebook profile after their relationship ended. This threat caused significant distress to the young girl, prompting her to seek help from the police.
Fiona Swain, the prosecutor, outlined the details of the case, emphasizing that Houlton was fully aware of the girl’s age when their relationship began. She stated that Houlton knew she was only 15 years old and that they had engaged in sexual activity shortly after they started dating. The prosecutor highlighted that Houlton’s actions were knowingly illegal, and he was aware that his conduct was wrong.
Houlton admitted to police that he had taken several photographs of his underage girlfriend but claimed that he only saved two of these images. When questioned about his threats to post the images online or share them with her friends, Houlton insisted that his comments were meant as a joke. However, he did acknowledge that he had threatened to spread the images around her school, which added to the severity of the case.
Houlton, who resides on Lister Avenue in Rawmarsh, Rotherham, has a criminal history that includes convictions for possessing an imitation firearm and burglary. He has previously served four custodial sentences, indicating a pattern of criminal behavior. During the hearing, he pleaded guilty to three counts of engaging in sexual activity with a child and one count of distributing indecent images.
Defense lawyer Dermot Hughes argued that the relationship was consensual and that the girl had never expressed any complaints about their interactions. He also claimed that Houlton had no intention of actually distributing the images, asserting that they were posed at the girl’s request and that there was no malicious intent.
However, the presiding judge, Alan Goldsack, was not convinced by these arguments. He sentenced Houlton to 16 months in prison, emphasizing the gravity of his actions. Judge Goldsack stated, “You knew perfectly well that having sex with a girl under 16 was against the law. The law is there to protect young girls from themselves as well as young men.”
He further added, “You took photos of her on your phone, and it was the fact she discovered you were thinking of distributing them on Facebook or to schoolfriends that caused her to put the matter in the hands of the police, indicating perhaps where her priorities lie.”
In addition to his prison sentence, Houlton was subjected to a Sex Offenders Prevention Order, which prohibits him from contacting the girl or engaging in any further inappropriate conduct involving minors. The case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of safeguarding young individuals from exploitation and the legal consequences of such actions.