IAN THOMSON SENTENCED IN DUMFRIES FOR RAPE AND SEXUAL OFFENCES AT GLASGOW HIGH COURT
| Red Rose Database
Dumfries Rapist
In December 2015, Ian Thomson, a man from Dumfries, was formally sentenced for a series of heinous sexual crimes committed over a span of years, involving multiple victims in the Dumfries area. The court proceedings, held at the High Court in Glasgow, revealed the disturbing extent of Thomson’s offending, which included the rape of six women, some of whom were minors at the time of their assault.
During the trial, three victims recounted their traumatic experiences, describing how Thomson’s behavior after assaulting them was marked by a chilling lack of remorse, with some victims stating that he laughed after raping them. One woman testified that Thomson physically assaulted her and exerted control over her, to the extent that she felt compelled to seek his permission before taking any action. These accounts painted a picture of a manipulative and violent offender who exploited vulnerabilities for his own gratification.
The sentencing hearing took place on 22 December 2014, with Judge John Beckett QC presiding. Thomson was convicted of multiple charges, including six counts of rape, and was sentenced to a total of thirteen years and six months in prison. Additionally, an Order for Lifelong Restriction was imposed, reflecting the court’s assessment of the significant danger Thomson posed to the public, particularly women and girls.
In his remarks, Judge Beckett emphasized the gravity of Thomson’s crimes, noting that he had carefully reviewed the social work and risk assessment reports. The judge acknowledged Thomson’s age at the time of some offenses and the passage of time since their commission but highlighted that the pattern of behavior demonstrated a high risk of reoffending. The court considered Thomson’s previous convictions, which, although not of significant gravity, were overshadowed by the numerous recent offenses.
The judge detailed the disturbing nature of Thomson’s interactions with his victims, many of whom were vulnerable. Evidence showed that Thomson could appear charming and considerate initially but would quickly become controlling and violent. For example, charges included opportunistic rapes of a 15-year-old girl he had just met and a 14-year-old girl he intoxicated with alcohol at a remote farm, where escape was unlikely. The court noted the profound impact on victims and observed Thomson’s apparent lack of insight or remorse.
Given the severity and pattern of his crimes, the court determined that Thomson’s release into the community would pose a serious risk to public safety. The risk assessment indicated that Thomson demonstrated an enduring propensity for violence and sexual offending, making close supervision and monitoring essential. The court accepted expert opinions that treatment was unlikely to mitigate the risk, reinforcing the need for restrictions to protect society.
Thomson’s crimes spanned before and after the legal change in sentencing regime on 20 June 2006. The court could not impose a Lifelong Restriction on crimes committed before this date, so separate considerations were made for those offenses. The total sentence for the crimes committed after this date was set at twelve years and three months, backdated to 22 August 2013, with some sentences to run consecutively.
Specific sentences included six years for the repeated rape of JT, one year for assaulting her, and additional terms for other offenses, including sexual assaults and breaches of the Telecommunications Act. Several charges resulted in admonishments, reflecting their lesser severity. The cumulative effect of these sentences was a complex structure of concurrent and consecutive terms, culminating in a total imprisonment period of over twelve years.
Furthermore, Thomson received an Order for Lifelong Restriction for the most serious offenses, including multiple counts of rape and assault. The court determined that the punishment part of this order would be nine years, backdated to 22 August 2013, and that Thomson would be subject to indefinite notification requirements. The order means Thomson will remain in prison until the Parole Board deems it safe for him to be released, which is not guaranteed, given the severity of his crimes and the risk he poses.
The court also ordered that the Scottish Ministers be notified of Thomson’s conviction, ensuring he is considered unsuitable for work involving contact with young people. This case underscores the serious approach taken by the justice system in dealing with sexual offenders, especially those with a pattern of predatory behavior, to safeguard the community from future harm.
During the trial, three victims recounted their traumatic experiences, describing how Thomson’s behavior after assaulting them was marked by a chilling lack of remorse, with some victims stating that he laughed after raping them. One woman testified that Thomson physically assaulted her and exerted control over her, to the extent that she felt compelled to seek his permission before taking any action. These accounts painted a picture of a manipulative and violent offender who exploited vulnerabilities for his own gratification.
The sentencing hearing took place on 22 December 2014, with Judge John Beckett QC presiding. Thomson was convicted of multiple charges, including six counts of rape, and was sentenced to a total of thirteen years and six months in prison. Additionally, an Order for Lifelong Restriction was imposed, reflecting the court’s assessment of the significant danger Thomson posed to the public, particularly women and girls.
In his remarks, Judge Beckett emphasized the gravity of Thomson’s crimes, noting that he had carefully reviewed the social work and risk assessment reports. The judge acknowledged Thomson’s age at the time of some offenses and the passage of time since their commission but highlighted that the pattern of behavior demonstrated a high risk of reoffending. The court considered Thomson’s previous convictions, which, although not of significant gravity, were overshadowed by the numerous recent offenses.
The judge detailed the disturbing nature of Thomson’s interactions with his victims, many of whom were vulnerable. Evidence showed that Thomson could appear charming and considerate initially but would quickly become controlling and violent. For example, charges included opportunistic rapes of a 15-year-old girl he had just met and a 14-year-old girl he intoxicated with alcohol at a remote farm, where escape was unlikely. The court noted the profound impact on victims and observed Thomson’s apparent lack of insight or remorse.
Given the severity and pattern of his crimes, the court determined that Thomson’s release into the community would pose a serious risk to public safety. The risk assessment indicated that Thomson demonstrated an enduring propensity for violence and sexual offending, making close supervision and monitoring essential. The court accepted expert opinions that treatment was unlikely to mitigate the risk, reinforcing the need for restrictions to protect society.
Thomson’s crimes spanned before and after the legal change in sentencing regime on 20 June 2006. The court could not impose a Lifelong Restriction on crimes committed before this date, so separate considerations were made for those offenses. The total sentence for the crimes committed after this date was set at twelve years and three months, backdated to 22 August 2013, with some sentences to run consecutively.
Specific sentences included six years for the repeated rape of JT, one year for assaulting her, and additional terms for other offenses, including sexual assaults and breaches of the Telecommunications Act. Several charges resulted in admonishments, reflecting their lesser severity. The cumulative effect of these sentences was a complex structure of concurrent and consecutive terms, culminating in a total imprisonment period of over twelve years.
Furthermore, Thomson received an Order for Lifelong Restriction for the most serious offenses, including multiple counts of rape and assault. The court determined that the punishment part of this order would be nine years, backdated to 22 August 2013, and that Thomson would be subject to indefinite notification requirements. The order means Thomson will remain in prison until the Parole Board deems it safe for him to be released, which is not guaranteed, given the severity of his crimes and the risk he poses.
The court also ordered that the Scottish Ministers be notified of Thomson’s conviction, ensuring he is considered unsuitable for work involving contact with young people. This case underscores the serious approach taken by the justice system in dealing with sexual offenders, especially those with a pattern of predatory behavior, to safeguard the community from future harm.