IAN MORRIS FROM NEWPORT ESCAPES JAIL AFTER VIEWING DISTURBING CHILD ABUSE IMAGES IN NEWPORT
| Red Rose Database
Newport Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the community of Newport, Ian Morris, a 48-year-old resident of Vicarage Hill, was found to have downloaded and possessed a collection of highly disturbing and illegal images depicting child abuse. The incident came to light during a police search of Morris’s flat on December 13, where authorities uncovered a total of 73 indecent images stored across a computer drive and two USB sticks. Among these images, ten were classified in the most severe Category A, indicating the involvement of children as young as six years old in sexual acts, with others depicting children between the ages of eight and 14 engaged in similar acts. The police investigation revealed that Morris had been downloading such material since 2010, suggesting a prolonged period of illicit activity.
The police also discovered videos of extreme pornography, including scenes involving animals, which are considered highly illegal and morally reprehensible. During a police interview, Morris admitted to the ongoing downloading of these images, acknowledging his involvement over several years. Prior to this, Morris had pleaded guilty to five charges, including making indecent images, possessing extreme pornography, and possessing images of child abuse. The charges also included a video depicting sexual acts involving an animal, either dead or alive.
Legal proceedings took place at Newport Crown Court, where Morris appeared to face justice. Marian Lewis, representing Morris, argued that her client was at a ‘low risk’ of committing further sexual offenses, attempting to mitigate the severity of his actions. However, the presiding judge, Jeremy Jenkins, described the images as ‘disturbing’ and ‘disgraceful,’ emphasizing the gravity of the offense. Despite acknowledging the relatively low quantity of images compared to other cases, Judge Jenkins expressed concern over the nature of the material, which depicted real child abuse and contributed to the perpetuation of such heinous acts.
In sentencing, Judge Jenkins handed Morris an eight-month prison sentence, which was suspended for two years. Additionally, Morris was placed on the sexual offenders’ register for a decade and was ordered to complete a two-year community order, including participation in a rehabilitation activity program. The judge made it clear that this was Morris’s ‘first and only chance’ to avoid more severe punishment, underscoring the seriousness of his crimes and the importance of rehabilitation to prevent future offenses.
The police also discovered videos of extreme pornography, including scenes involving animals, which are considered highly illegal and morally reprehensible. During a police interview, Morris admitted to the ongoing downloading of these images, acknowledging his involvement over several years. Prior to this, Morris had pleaded guilty to five charges, including making indecent images, possessing extreme pornography, and possessing images of child abuse. The charges also included a video depicting sexual acts involving an animal, either dead or alive.
Legal proceedings took place at Newport Crown Court, where Morris appeared to face justice. Marian Lewis, representing Morris, argued that her client was at a ‘low risk’ of committing further sexual offenses, attempting to mitigate the severity of his actions. However, the presiding judge, Jeremy Jenkins, described the images as ‘disturbing’ and ‘disgraceful,’ emphasizing the gravity of the offense. Despite acknowledging the relatively low quantity of images compared to other cases, Judge Jenkins expressed concern over the nature of the material, which depicted real child abuse and contributed to the perpetuation of such heinous acts.
In sentencing, Judge Jenkins handed Morris an eight-month prison sentence, which was suspended for two years. Additionally, Morris was placed on the sexual offenders’ register for a decade and was ordered to complete a two-year community order, including participation in a rehabilitation activity program. The judge made it clear that this was Morris’s ‘first and only chance’ to avoid more severe punishment, underscoring the seriousness of his crimes and the importance of rehabilitation to prevent future offenses.