GLYNN DAVIES FROM WHITEHAVEN SENTENCED FOR CHILD INDECENT IMAGES IN CUMBRIA
| Red Rose Database
Whitehaven Child Sexual Abuser
Glynn Davies, a 37-year-old resident of Whitehaven, was formally sentenced at Workington Magistrates' Court following charges related to the possession and downloading of indecent images of children. The case drew significant attention due to the disturbing nature of the images involved and the implications for community safety in the Whitehaven area.
According to court records, Davies admitted to possessing a total of 86 indecent images, categorized into three levels of severity. Specifically, he was found to have made 37 images classified as Category A, which are considered the most severe, involving explicit depictions of children. Additionally, he possessed 15 images categorized as Category B and 34 images falling under Category C. Among these images, there was evidence of a female child estimated to be between three and four years old, which was found on devices seized from his home.
The investigation was initiated after Cumbria Police received a referral from an external law enforcement agency. This referral indicated that indecent images had been obtained from Davies' residence in Whitehaven. During the subsequent investigation, authorities seized three mobile phones from Davies after his arrest at his workplace. Forensic analysis of these devices confirmed the presence of the illicit images, including some depicting a very young girl, which heightened the severity of the case.
Throughout the police interviews, Davies was questioned twice but chose to remain silent, offering 'no comment' to all inquiries. The case raised considerable concern within the community, primarily due to the ages of the children depicted and the seriousness of the Category A images, which are associated with the most severe forms of child exploitation.
In court, Davies was sentenced to a 12-month custodial sentence, which was suspended for 12 months. The magistrates expressed the view that there was a 'realistic prospect' of rehabilitation, considering his circumstances. As part of his sentence, Davies is required to sign the Sex Offenders' Register for a period of ten years and is subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order that will remain in effect for seven years. Furthermore, he must complete 15 days of rehabilitation activities and perform 250 hours of unpaid community work.
Additional penalties include a financial order requiring Davies to pay £85 in court costs and a victim surcharge of £184. The magistrates acknowledged that the number of images involved was relatively limited compared to similar cases, which often involve extensive collections. They also noted the impact of the case on Davies' personal life, including the loss of his employment and strained family relationships, as a consequence of his actions.
Overall, the case highlights ongoing concerns about child exploitation and the importance of law enforcement efforts in tackling such crimes within communities like Whitehaven and across Cumbria.
According to court records, Davies admitted to possessing a total of 86 indecent images, categorized into three levels of severity. Specifically, he was found to have made 37 images classified as Category A, which are considered the most severe, involving explicit depictions of children. Additionally, he possessed 15 images categorized as Category B and 34 images falling under Category C. Among these images, there was evidence of a female child estimated to be between three and four years old, which was found on devices seized from his home.
The investigation was initiated after Cumbria Police received a referral from an external law enforcement agency. This referral indicated that indecent images had been obtained from Davies' residence in Whitehaven. During the subsequent investigation, authorities seized three mobile phones from Davies after his arrest at his workplace. Forensic analysis of these devices confirmed the presence of the illicit images, including some depicting a very young girl, which heightened the severity of the case.
Throughout the police interviews, Davies was questioned twice but chose to remain silent, offering 'no comment' to all inquiries. The case raised considerable concern within the community, primarily due to the ages of the children depicted and the seriousness of the Category A images, which are associated with the most severe forms of child exploitation.
In court, Davies was sentenced to a 12-month custodial sentence, which was suspended for 12 months. The magistrates expressed the view that there was a 'realistic prospect' of rehabilitation, considering his circumstances. As part of his sentence, Davies is required to sign the Sex Offenders' Register for a period of ten years and is subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order that will remain in effect for seven years. Furthermore, he must complete 15 days of rehabilitation activities and perform 250 hours of unpaid community work.
Additional penalties include a financial order requiring Davies to pay £85 in court costs and a victim surcharge of £184. The magistrates acknowledged that the number of images involved was relatively limited compared to similar cases, which often involve extensive collections. They also noted the impact of the case on Davies' personal life, including the loss of his employment and strained family relationships, as a consequence of his actions.
Overall, the case highlights ongoing concerns about child exploitation and the importance of law enforcement efforts in tackling such crimes within communities like Whitehaven and across Cumbria.