GERRY KELLY FROM BALLINASLOE ESCAPES JAIL AFTER DECADES-LONG INDECENT ASSAULT CASE IN GALWAY
| Red Rose Database
Ballinasloe Sexual Abuser
In a case that spanned decades and finally reached its conclusion in Galway Circuit Court, Gerry Kelly, a 70-year-old man from Beach Lawn, Ballinasloe, faced charges related to the indecent assault of a minor during the mid-1980s. The incident, which took place between November 7, 1985, and January 6, 1986, had remained unresolved for many years until recent legal proceedings brought it back into the spotlight.
Initially, Kelly denied the allegations, maintaining his innocence at the outset of the case. However, just before the trial was set to commence in February, after a jury had been selected, Kelly changed his plea to guilty. This shift came after the court had heard evidence and the defendant decided to admit to a single charge of indecent assault, with multiple other charges being withdrawn. The court was informed that Kelly’s guilty plea was partly motivated by a desire to avoid further distress for the victim, who had expressed her wish not to pursue a harsh sentence but rather to see Kelly understand the gravity of his actions.
Garda Adrian Fehily provided detailed testimony about the victim, who was a teenage girl at the time of the assault. Garda Fehily described her as someone with very few boundaries in her home life, often attending nightclubs and consuming alcohol. It was through her social activities that she came into contact with Kelly, who was 37 years old at the time and employed as a bouncer in Ballinasloe. Over time, the two developed a relationship, which the court heard involved acts of indecent oral sexual abuse carried out in Kelly’s car at various locations.
The court clarified that at the time of the incidents, there was no coercion involved, and the victim believed she was Kelly’s girlfriend. However, her perspective has since changed, and she now wishes Kelly to comprehend the seriousness of his misconduct. Garda Fehily emphasized that Kelly’s guilty plea was a source of comfort to the victim, who was anxious about having to testify in court. The victim, who chose not to appear publicly during the proceedings, expressed her desire for Kelly to be identified.
Prosecutor Geri Silke highlighted that the victim wanted her attacker to be named, underscoring the importance of accountability. Defence counsel Paul Flannery SC acknowledged Kelly’s feelings of shame, embarrassment, and regret, stating that these emotions have significantly affected his family life. An apology from Kelly was read aloud in court, in which he expressed his remorse and said he was “truly sorry” for the pain caused to the victim. He also stated that his guilty plea was intended to prevent her from experiencing further suffering.
Judge Rory McCabe addressed the court, noting the profound impact the abuse had on the victim. He remarked that Kelly’s exploitation of her for his own gratification was a grave breach of trust, especially considering her initial trust and confidence in him. The judge pointed out that her charitable attitude towards Kelly contrasted sharply with his actions, making the case even more troubling.
While acknowledging the guilty plea, which was entered after the jury had been empanelled, Judge McCabe expressed some reservations. Typically, such an offence would warrant immediate imprisonment; however, he was persuaded by the victim’s attitude and her desire for leniency. As a result, he sentenced Kelly to three years in prison, but this sentence was entirely suspended for three years. Additionally, Kelly is required to register as a sex offender, a measure intended to monitor and prevent future offenses.
In conclusion, the case underscores the long-lasting effects of abuse and the complexities involved in delivering justice, especially when the victim’s wishes and the defendant’s remorse are taken into account. The court’s decision reflects a balance between accountability and compassion, with Kelly avoiding immediate imprisonment but facing significant legal obligations moving forward.
Initially, Kelly denied the allegations, maintaining his innocence at the outset of the case. However, just before the trial was set to commence in February, after a jury had been selected, Kelly changed his plea to guilty. This shift came after the court had heard evidence and the defendant decided to admit to a single charge of indecent assault, with multiple other charges being withdrawn. The court was informed that Kelly’s guilty plea was partly motivated by a desire to avoid further distress for the victim, who had expressed her wish not to pursue a harsh sentence but rather to see Kelly understand the gravity of his actions.
Garda Adrian Fehily provided detailed testimony about the victim, who was a teenage girl at the time of the assault. Garda Fehily described her as someone with very few boundaries in her home life, often attending nightclubs and consuming alcohol. It was through her social activities that she came into contact with Kelly, who was 37 years old at the time and employed as a bouncer in Ballinasloe. Over time, the two developed a relationship, which the court heard involved acts of indecent oral sexual abuse carried out in Kelly’s car at various locations.
The court clarified that at the time of the incidents, there was no coercion involved, and the victim believed she was Kelly’s girlfriend. However, her perspective has since changed, and she now wishes Kelly to comprehend the seriousness of his misconduct. Garda Fehily emphasized that Kelly’s guilty plea was a source of comfort to the victim, who was anxious about having to testify in court. The victim, who chose not to appear publicly during the proceedings, expressed her desire for Kelly to be identified.
Prosecutor Geri Silke highlighted that the victim wanted her attacker to be named, underscoring the importance of accountability. Defence counsel Paul Flannery SC acknowledged Kelly’s feelings of shame, embarrassment, and regret, stating that these emotions have significantly affected his family life. An apology from Kelly was read aloud in court, in which he expressed his remorse and said he was “truly sorry” for the pain caused to the victim. He also stated that his guilty plea was intended to prevent her from experiencing further suffering.
Judge Rory McCabe addressed the court, noting the profound impact the abuse had on the victim. He remarked that Kelly’s exploitation of her for his own gratification was a grave breach of trust, especially considering her initial trust and confidence in him. The judge pointed out that her charitable attitude towards Kelly contrasted sharply with his actions, making the case even more troubling.
While acknowledging the guilty plea, which was entered after the jury had been empanelled, Judge McCabe expressed some reservations. Typically, such an offence would warrant immediate imprisonment; however, he was persuaded by the victim’s attitude and her desire for leniency. As a result, he sentenced Kelly to three years in prison, but this sentence was entirely suspended for three years. Additionally, Kelly is required to register as a sex offender, a measure intended to monitor and prevent future offenses.
In conclusion, the case underscores the long-lasting effects of abuse and the complexities involved in delivering justice, especially when the victim’s wishes and the defendant’s remorse are taken into account. The court’s decision reflects a balance between accountability and compassion, with Kelly avoiding immediate imprisonment but facing significant legal obligations moving forward.