GEORGINA HILL FROM ASTON MAGNA ESCAPES JAIL AFTER SEDUCING 15-YEAR-OLD BOY IN COTSWOLDS
| Red Rose Database
Aston Magna Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has drawn significant attention, Georgina Hill, a young mother residing in Aston Magna near Moreton-in-Marsh, was found guilty of engaging in sexual activities with a minor after seducing a 15-year-old boy through Facebook. The incident took place in her home within the picturesque Cotswolds region, and the court proceedings revealed disturbing details about their interactions and the subsequent investigation.
According to court reports, Hill, who was 20 years old at the time, admitted to having sexual contact with the boy between September 1st and September 20th, 2015. The case came to light when the boy’s grandmother, after reviewing messages on Facebook, discovered evidence indicating that her grandson and Hill had engaged in full sexual intercourse. This discovery prompted her to report the matter to the police, despite the boy’s own reluctance to pursue legal action.
Prosecutor Christopher Smythe explained to Gloucester Crown Court that Hill was aware of the boy’s age, as she had explicitly asked him on Facebook when he would turn sixteen. The court was told that the relationship began shortly after Hill moved into her current residence with her partner and her one-year-old daughter. The boy started visiting her home, initially to smoke cigarettes, and the two eventually became Facebook friends, exchanging flirtatious messages and discussing the possibility of a romantic relationship.
Details of their encounters revealed that the first sexual interaction occurred on September 11th, when the boy visited Hill’s house with friends. They shared a kiss and later went to bed together, although their time was interrupted by a call from his grandmother. The following Sunday, September 13th, the boy returned to Hill’s house in the morning, and they engaged in sexual intercourse in her bed. The boy stated that he wanted to have sex with her and insisted that the encounter was a one-time event. However, the ongoing contact between them raised concerns for his grandmother, leading her to contact the authorities.
Hill was arrested but chose not to answer questions during police questioning. The court noted that she had no prior criminal record and was living with her grandparents at the time of the offence. The case also highlighted that alcohol was involved during the incident, which the judge considered an aggravating factor.
Judge Michael Cullum sentenced Hill to eight months in prison, but the sentence was suspended for one year. Additionally, Hill was ordered to register as a sex offender for seven years, barred from working with children, and required to complete 20 days of rehabilitation activities. A five-year restraining order was also imposed, prohibiting her from contacting the now 16-year-old boy.
During the sentencing, Judge Cullum emphasized the seriousness of the offence, stating that Hill knew her actions were wrong, as evidenced by the Facebook messages. He explained that the legal age of consent is set at sixteen because children under that age are considered vulnerable and in need of protection. The judge expressed concern about the potential long-term effects of Hill’s actions on the boy, acknowledging that the full impact might not yet be known.
Mrs. Jenkins, representing Hill, provided context about her client’s personal circumstances, including her living arrangements and past relationships. She mentioned that Hill’s mental health issues, compounded by her recent breakup and her history of relationships with significantly older men, may have influenced her judgment. The court was also informed that Hill’s relationship with her daughter’s father had ended, and her current living situation involved her grandparents and her daughter, who is now in the care of her father but with ongoing access to Hill.
In conclusion, Judge Cullum highlighted the importance of the law in protecting minors and reiterated that Hill’s deliberate actions had caused harm. He stressed that her awareness of the illegality and her conscious decision to proceed with the relationship warranted serious consequences, even though her sentence was ultimately suspended. The rehabilitation requirement aims to give her an opportunity to reflect on her actions and address the circumstances that led to her misconduct.
According to court reports, Hill, who was 20 years old at the time, admitted to having sexual contact with the boy between September 1st and September 20th, 2015. The case came to light when the boy’s grandmother, after reviewing messages on Facebook, discovered evidence indicating that her grandson and Hill had engaged in full sexual intercourse. This discovery prompted her to report the matter to the police, despite the boy’s own reluctance to pursue legal action.
Prosecutor Christopher Smythe explained to Gloucester Crown Court that Hill was aware of the boy’s age, as she had explicitly asked him on Facebook when he would turn sixteen. The court was told that the relationship began shortly after Hill moved into her current residence with her partner and her one-year-old daughter. The boy started visiting her home, initially to smoke cigarettes, and the two eventually became Facebook friends, exchanging flirtatious messages and discussing the possibility of a romantic relationship.
Details of their encounters revealed that the first sexual interaction occurred on September 11th, when the boy visited Hill’s house with friends. They shared a kiss and later went to bed together, although their time was interrupted by a call from his grandmother. The following Sunday, September 13th, the boy returned to Hill’s house in the morning, and they engaged in sexual intercourse in her bed. The boy stated that he wanted to have sex with her and insisted that the encounter was a one-time event. However, the ongoing contact between them raised concerns for his grandmother, leading her to contact the authorities.
Hill was arrested but chose not to answer questions during police questioning. The court noted that she had no prior criminal record and was living with her grandparents at the time of the offence. The case also highlighted that alcohol was involved during the incident, which the judge considered an aggravating factor.
Judge Michael Cullum sentenced Hill to eight months in prison, but the sentence was suspended for one year. Additionally, Hill was ordered to register as a sex offender for seven years, barred from working with children, and required to complete 20 days of rehabilitation activities. A five-year restraining order was also imposed, prohibiting her from contacting the now 16-year-old boy.
During the sentencing, Judge Cullum emphasized the seriousness of the offence, stating that Hill knew her actions were wrong, as evidenced by the Facebook messages. He explained that the legal age of consent is set at sixteen because children under that age are considered vulnerable and in need of protection. The judge expressed concern about the potential long-term effects of Hill’s actions on the boy, acknowledging that the full impact might not yet be known.
Mrs. Jenkins, representing Hill, provided context about her client’s personal circumstances, including her living arrangements and past relationships. She mentioned that Hill’s mental health issues, compounded by her recent breakup and her history of relationships with significantly older men, may have influenced her judgment. The court was also informed that Hill’s relationship with her daughter’s father had ended, and her current living situation involved her grandparents and her daughter, who is now in the care of her father but with ongoing access to Hill.
In conclusion, Judge Cullum highlighted the importance of the law in protecting minors and reiterated that Hill’s deliberate actions had caused harm. He stressed that her awareness of the illegality and her conscious decision to proceed with the relationship warranted serious consequences, even though her sentence was ultimately suspended. The rehabilitation requirement aims to give her an opportunity to reflect on her actions and address the circumstances that led to her misconduct.