FRANK BELL FROM TRIMLEY ST MARTIN SENTENCED FOR CHILD ABUSE IMAGES IN IPSWICH
| Red Rose Database
Trimley St Martin Child Sexual Abuser
In December 2013, a former parish councillor from Trimley St Martin, Frank Bell, faced serious legal consequences after admitting to charges related to the possession and distribution of indecent images of children. Bell, aged 61 and residing on Mill Close in Trimley St Martin, was subjected to a five-year sexual offences prevention order as part of his sentencing. Additionally, he was fined £360 by Ipswich magistrates for his crimes.
Bell had previously pleaded guilty earlier in the month to two charges: one for creating an indecent photograph of a child and another for distributing such images. These offences were committed on or before June 18 of that year, according to court records. The charges stemmed from an investigation that was initiated after authorities executed a search warrant at another individual’s residence in early February. During this operation, computer devices were seized, revealing that illicit images had been both sent from and received at Bell’s address.
Subsequently, on June 18, law enforcement officials carried out a search at Bell’s home. During this raid, a Dell computer tower was confiscated, and it was on this device that the indecent images were discovered. Prior to his guilty pleas, Bell had no previous criminal record, making this case particularly notable within the local community.
As part of his sentencing, magistrates also ordered Bell to contribute £36 to the victims’ fund and £85 towards prosecution costs. The court’s decision underscores the severity of his actions and the importance of safeguarding children from exploitation and abuse.
Following Bell’s conviction, the Trimley St Martin Parish Council issued a formal statement. The council confirmed that it held its regular meeting on Tuesday, November 5, but Bell was not present, having already sent his apologies to the clerk on October 31. The council also announced that Bell had submitted a written resignation letter, which was received by the chairman, John Barker, on the same day. The statement clarified that Bell had resigned from his position as a parish councillor prior to his court appearance, and his offences were entirely unrelated to his duties within the council. The community and local authorities continue to emphasize the importance of accountability and the protection of vulnerable individuals in light of this case.
Bell had previously pleaded guilty earlier in the month to two charges: one for creating an indecent photograph of a child and another for distributing such images. These offences were committed on or before June 18 of that year, according to court records. The charges stemmed from an investigation that was initiated after authorities executed a search warrant at another individual’s residence in early February. During this operation, computer devices were seized, revealing that illicit images had been both sent from and received at Bell’s address.
Subsequently, on June 18, law enforcement officials carried out a search at Bell’s home. During this raid, a Dell computer tower was confiscated, and it was on this device that the indecent images were discovered. Prior to his guilty pleas, Bell had no previous criminal record, making this case particularly notable within the local community.
As part of his sentencing, magistrates also ordered Bell to contribute £36 to the victims’ fund and £85 towards prosecution costs. The court’s decision underscores the severity of his actions and the importance of safeguarding children from exploitation and abuse.
Following Bell’s conviction, the Trimley St Martin Parish Council issued a formal statement. The council confirmed that it held its regular meeting on Tuesday, November 5, but Bell was not present, having already sent his apologies to the clerk on October 31. The council also announced that Bell had submitted a written resignation letter, which was received by the chairman, John Barker, on the same day. The statement clarified that Bell had resigned from his position as a parish councillor prior to his court appearance, and his offences were entirely unrelated to his duties within the council. The community and local authorities continue to emphasize the importance of accountability and the protection of vulnerable individuals in light of this case.