DOMINIC NIELEN SENTENCED IN GROOTEN CASE FOR GROOMING YOUNG GIRL IN EAST DEVON
| Red Rose Database
Groen Child Sexual Abuser
In August 2019, a serious case of online grooming and exploitation came to light involving Dominic Nielen, a man from Wolverhampton, who was convicted of grooming a vulnerable 15-year-old girl through social media. The case was heard at Exeter Crown Court, where a judge condemned the role of Instagram in facilitating such dangerous activities, criticizing the platform for hosting communities that attract paedophiles and predators.
Dominic Nielen, known by his online alias 'Papa Bear' within the Instagram community, used the platform to engage with the young girl, who had adopted the name 'F****** Little Brat.' Over a period of weeks, Nielen-Groen sent her numerous messages, building a relationship that eventually led to him traveling from Wolverhampton to Seaton in East Devon, a journey of approximately 167 miles. His intent was to meet her in person, which he did at a local play park. Upon meeting, he embraced her, but the situation took a disturbing turn when he attempted to get her to suck on a baby’s dummy, causing her to become alarmed and distressed. She quickly left the scene, but Nielen-Groen persisted in messaging her, trying to arrange a second meeting at a nearby beach or nature reserve.
During the investigation, police uncovered further disturbing evidence in Nielen-Groen’s home, including a dummy and a collar inscribed with 'Little Girl,' along with a contract reminiscent of the 'Fifty Shades' series, outlining rules and punishments. These punishments included spanking, self-spanking, slaps, cold baths, being tied up, as well as timeouts and restrictions on television and internet access. Some of the rules were explicitly sexual, forbidding masturbation and participation in various sex acts at the behest of the 'Daddy.'
It was revealed that Nielen-Groen, a graduate of Birmingham City University, resided on Annan Road in Wolverhampton. He denied meeting a child with the intent to commit a sexual offence, claiming he believed the girl was an adult engaged in role-play. However, the court found him guilty of grooming and meeting a child for sexual purposes. The judge, Recorder Mr. Jonathan Barnes, sentenced him to 18 months in prison, ordered him to register as a sex offender, and imposed a Sexual Harm Prevention Order. This order restricts his future contact with children and allows authorities to monitor his internet activity.
The judge also criticized Instagram for its failure to provide chat logs of the conversations between Nielen-Groen and the girl, stating, "Sometimes these social media companies put misplaced loyalty to their customers before the administration of justice." He emphasized that the DDLG (Daddy Dom Little Girl) community was widely exploited by paedophiles like Nielen-Groen. The court heard that Nielen-Groen had flattered the girl, encouraging her to be his 'little,' and traveled to Devon with the clear intention of engaging in a sexual offence, fully aware that she was under 16.
During the trial, Nielen-Groen claimed he was unaware of her age, believing her to be an adult involved in age-play and role-play fantasies. He insisted he traveled to Devon with no intention of sexual activity, claiming he was shocked when she revealed her age at the park in Seaton. The girl testified that she joined the DDLG community out of loneliness, seeking friendship online. She admitted that she initially found the community appealing but soon realized the darker side of some users. Her Instagram account remained active for months before it was removed.
She described how her account grew rapidly, attracting over 3,000 followers, and how she engaged in sending explicit images of her body, including her chest and bottom, in exchange for money. She explained that she was messaging over 20 men daily, many of whom wanted sexual conversations, and that she had blocked some users. Despite stating her age as 15, she acknowledged that some users believed she was older, and she had posted her PayPal details once on her story, although she claimed it was not a recurring practice. Her account was marked as not suitable for minors, but she was still vulnerable to predatory behavior from older men, some of whom she communicated with directly, often engaging in explicit discussions.
Overall, the case highlights the dangers of online communities that can be exploited by individuals with harmful intentions. The court’s decision underscores the importance of social media platforms taking responsibility for the safety of their users and the need for vigilance in protecting minors from exploitation and abuse.
Dominic Nielen, known by his online alias 'Papa Bear' within the Instagram community, used the platform to engage with the young girl, who had adopted the name 'F****** Little Brat.' Over a period of weeks, Nielen-Groen sent her numerous messages, building a relationship that eventually led to him traveling from Wolverhampton to Seaton in East Devon, a journey of approximately 167 miles. His intent was to meet her in person, which he did at a local play park. Upon meeting, he embraced her, but the situation took a disturbing turn when he attempted to get her to suck on a baby’s dummy, causing her to become alarmed and distressed. She quickly left the scene, but Nielen-Groen persisted in messaging her, trying to arrange a second meeting at a nearby beach or nature reserve.
During the investigation, police uncovered further disturbing evidence in Nielen-Groen’s home, including a dummy and a collar inscribed with 'Little Girl,' along with a contract reminiscent of the 'Fifty Shades' series, outlining rules and punishments. These punishments included spanking, self-spanking, slaps, cold baths, being tied up, as well as timeouts and restrictions on television and internet access. Some of the rules were explicitly sexual, forbidding masturbation and participation in various sex acts at the behest of the 'Daddy.'
It was revealed that Nielen-Groen, a graduate of Birmingham City University, resided on Annan Road in Wolverhampton. He denied meeting a child with the intent to commit a sexual offence, claiming he believed the girl was an adult engaged in role-play. However, the court found him guilty of grooming and meeting a child for sexual purposes. The judge, Recorder Mr. Jonathan Barnes, sentenced him to 18 months in prison, ordered him to register as a sex offender, and imposed a Sexual Harm Prevention Order. This order restricts his future contact with children and allows authorities to monitor his internet activity.
The judge also criticized Instagram for its failure to provide chat logs of the conversations between Nielen-Groen and the girl, stating, "Sometimes these social media companies put misplaced loyalty to their customers before the administration of justice." He emphasized that the DDLG (Daddy Dom Little Girl) community was widely exploited by paedophiles like Nielen-Groen. The court heard that Nielen-Groen had flattered the girl, encouraging her to be his 'little,' and traveled to Devon with the clear intention of engaging in a sexual offence, fully aware that she was under 16.
During the trial, Nielen-Groen claimed he was unaware of her age, believing her to be an adult involved in age-play and role-play fantasies. He insisted he traveled to Devon with no intention of sexual activity, claiming he was shocked when she revealed her age at the park in Seaton. The girl testified that she joined the DDLG community out of loneliness, seeking friendship online. She admitted that she initially found the community appealing but soon realized the darker side of some users. Her Instagram account remained active for months before it was removed.
She described how her account grew rapidly, attracting over 3,000 followers, and how she engaged in sending explicit images of her body, including her chest and bottom, in exchange for money. She explained that she was messaging over 20 men daily, many of whom wanted sexual conversations, and that she had blocked some users. Despite stating her age as 15, she acknowledged that some users believed she was older, and she had posted her PayPal details once on her story, although she claimed it was not a recurring practice. Her account was marked as not suitable for minors, but she was still vulnerable to predatory behavior from older men, some of whom she communicated with directly, often engaging in explicit discussions.
Overall, the case highlights the dangers of online communities that can be exploited by individuals with harmful intentions. The court’s decision underscores the importance of social media platforms taking responsibility for the safety of their users and the need for vigilance in protecting minors from exploitation and abuse.