DENNIS DALGLISH FROM NORTHFIELD SENTENCED FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND CHILD ENDANGERMENT IN BIRMINGHAM
| Red Rose Database
Northfield Child Sexual Abuser
In October 1999, a disturbing case unfolded in Birmingham involving Dennis Dalglish, a 48-year-old resident of Borrowdale Road, Northfield. Dalglish was brought before the city's crown court to face serious charges related to the possession and creation of indecent material involving young children. The court heard that Dalglish had been involved in the production and storage of pornographic videos, some of which included highly inappropriate and obscene footage that he had personally filmed within his own home environment.
The prosecution, led by Mr. Richard Griffith-Jones, outlined the gravity of Dalglish's actions, emphasizing his obsessive interest in young children. It was revealed that two of the victims were young children who had been lured to Dalglish’s residence with promises of gifts, a tactic used to manipulate and entice them into his home. The court was informed that Dalglish had not only kept explicit videos but had also created homemade footage that included real children, filmed in and around his property. These videos were not merely pornographic in nature but were deliberately assembled to include real material, capturing children either participating in or observing the illicit activities.
Further evidence presented showed that Dalglish had taken photographs of children in the nude during their visits, often making innocent games appear obscene on film. Police investigations uncovered footage shot at a party, showing children playing on a bouncy castle and walking around in swimming costumes, which Dalglish had also recorded. The court was told that these recordings were part of a disturbing pattern of behavior aimed at exploiting and endangering minors.
Judge Alistair McCreath delivered a stern judgment, acknowledging that Dalglish did not physically assault his victims. However, the judge emphasized the profound harm caused by Dalglish’s actions, describing his influence as “profoundly corrupting” and expressing concern that such behavior could have escalated to physical abuse in the future. As a result, Dalglish was sentenced to four years in prison. Additionally, the judge ordered that Dalglish should remain on licence for ten years following his release, reflecting the court’s serious concern about the potential risk he posed to society and the safety of children in the community.
The prosecution, led by Mr. Richard Griffith-Jones, outlined the gravity of Dalglish's actions, emphasizing his obsessive interest in young children. It was revealed that two of the victims were young children who had been lured to Dalglish’s residence with promises of gifts, a tactic used to manipulate and entice them into his home. The court was informed that Dalglish had not only kept explicit videos but had also created homemade footage that included real children, filmed in and around his property. These videos were not merely pornographic in nature but were deliberately assembled to include real material, capturing children either participating in or observing the illicit activities.
Further evidence presented showed that Dalglish had taken photographs of children in the nude during their visits, often making innocent games appear obscene on film. Police investigations uncovered footage shot at a party, showing children playing on a bouncy castle and walking around in swimming costumes, which Dalglish had also recorded. The court was told that these recordings were part of a disturbing pattern of behavior aimed at exploiting and endangering minors.
Judge Alistair McCreath delivered a stern judgment, acknowledging that Dalglish did not physically assault his victims. However, the judge emphasized the profound harm caused by Dalglish’s actions, describing his influence as “profoundly corrupting” and expressing concern that such behavior could have escalated to physical abuse in the future. As a result, Dalglish was sentenced to four years in prison. Additionally, the judge ordered that Dalglish should remain on licence for ten years following his release, reflecting the court’s serious concern about the potential risk he posed to society and the safety of children in the community.