DAVID WALL AND SHOCKING SEXUAL OFFENSES IN RINGWOOD AND HAMPSHIRE
| Red Rose Database
Ringwood Sexual Abuser
A convicted sex offender from Hampshire, David Wall, has received a suspended prison sentence after being found guilty of molesting a teenage boy during camping trips in the area. Wall, who is known for his previous criminal history and his involvement in charitable work, faced justice once again for offenses committed in the mid-2000s.
David Wall, a man who previously served time for similar crimes, was originally sentenced to seven years in prison at Plymouth Crown Court in 2017 for the indecent assault of four boys spanning from 1981 to 2001. After his release, he went on to establish a Christian charity based in Hampshire called Acts 4 Sharing. Despite his criminal past, Wall continued to offend, leading to his latest appearance in court.
The recent case was heard at Southampton Crown Court, where it was revealed that Wall’s abusive behavior towards a teenage victim took place over a two-year period from 2005 to 2007. The incidents occurred in the vicinity of the New Forest, a popular and scenic area in Hampshire, which Wall frequently visited. Prosecutor Peter Asteris outlined the disturbing details of the abuse, stating that during the first assault, Wall touched the teenager’s back and bottom. The victim, who tried to resist the advances, was reportedly restrained as Wall wrapped his arm around his neck and tightened his grip.
According to the prosecution, a second incident involved Wall caressing the teenager’s leg and bottom, actions that left the young victim severely distressed. In a detailed statement read to the court, the victim explained how the trauma had severely impacted his life. He described a loss of confidence and low self-esteem as a consequence of Wall’s actions. The victim also revealed that reading about Wall’s earlier trial in 2017 prompted him to come forward and report the offences, showing a sense of courage after many years of silence.
During the court proceedings, Wall, now 58 and residing at Ash Grove in Ringwood, denied two counts of sexual assault. Despite his denial, the jury convicted him after evidence was presented, leading to a sentencing hearing where Judge Peter Henry summarized the case. The judge noted that the assaults, which occurred over two separate occasions, were carried out over the victim’s clothing but still caused significant distress. The boy, who was a minor at the time, had to endure giving evidence and being cross-examined through the trial.
In mitigation, Thomas Horder, representing Wall, argued that his client had already served a substantial custodial sentence for past offences and should not be incarcerated again. Given Wall’s age, health, and conduct in prison, the judge acknowledged these factors but emphasized the gravity of the crimes committed in 2005 to 2007.
Ultimately, Judge Henry sentenced David Wall to nine months in prison, but the term was suspended for two years. Wall was also ordered to pay costs amounting to £2,500. The court’s decision highlights the continued seriousness with which sexual offenses are treated in Hampshire, especially in cases involving vulnerable victims and repeat offenders like Wall.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing efforts by authorities to address and combat sexual misconduct, regardless of the offender’s previous history or social standing.
David Wall, a man who previously served time for similar crimes, was originally sentenced to seven years in prison at Plymouth Crown Court in 2017 for the indecent assault of four boys spanning from 1981 to 2001. After his release, he went on to establish a Christian charity based in Hampshire called Acts 4 Sharing. Despite his criminal past, Wall continued to offend, leading to his latest appearance in court.
The recent case was heard at Southampton Crown Court, where it was revealed that Wall’s abusive behavior towards a teenage victim took place over a two-year period from 2005 to 2007. The incidents occurred in the vicinity of the New Forest, a popular and scenic area in Hampshire, which Wall frequently visited. Prosecutor Peter Asteris outlined the disturbing details of the abuse, stating that during the first assault, Wall touched the teenager’s back and bottom. The victim, who tried to resist the advances, was reportedly restrained as Wall wrapped his arm around his neck and tightened his grip.
According to the prosecution, a second incident involved Wall caressing the teenager’s leg and bottom, actions that left the young victim severely distressed. In a detailed statement read to the court, the victim explained how the trauma had severely impacted his life. He described a loss of confidence and low self-esteem as a consequence of Wall’s actions. The victim also revealed that reading about Wall’s earlier trial in 2017 prompted him to come forward and report the offences, showing a sense of courage after many years of silence.
During the court proceedings, Wall, now 58 and residing at Ash Grove in Ringwood, denied two counts of sexual assault. Despite his denial, the jury convicted him after evidence was presented, leading to a sentencing hearing where Judge Peter Henry summarized the case. The judge noted that the assaults, which occurred over two separate occasions, were carried out over the victim’s clothing but still caused significant distress. The boy, who was a minor at the time, had to endure giving evidence and being cross-examined through the trial.
In mitigation, Thomas Horder, representing Wall, argued that his client had already served a substantial custodial sentence for past offences and should not be incarcerated again. Given Wall’s age, health, and conduct in prison, the judge acknowledged these factors but emphasized the gravity of the crimes committed in 2005 to 2007.
Ultimately, Judge Henry sentenced David Wall to nine months in prison, but the term was suspended for two years. Wall was also ordered to pay costs amounting to £2,500. The court’s decision highlights the continued seriousness with which sexual offenses are treated in Hampshire, especially in cases involving vulnerable victims and repeat offenders like Wall.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing efforts by authorities to address and combat sexual misconduct, regardless of the offender’s previous history or social standing.