DAVID TAYLOR FROM SWINDON CAUGHT TRYING TO MEET LINCOLNSHIRE SCHOOLGIRL
In February 2016, a disturbing case unfolded involving David Taylor, a school IT worker from Swindon, who attempted to arrange a clandestine meeting with a 15-year-old girl from Lincolnshire.The incident came to light during a court hearing where Taylor faced serious charges related to sexual grooming and attempting to meet a minor for illicit purposes.
According to court records, Taylor engaged in a Facebook conversation with the young girl, who resides in East Lincolnshire, on December 28, 2014.
During this online exchange, Taylor made inappropriate and sexually suggestive comments, which raised alarm among those monitoring the conversation.
The court was informed that Taylor, then employed in the information technology department at a girls’ school in Wiltshire, had complimented the girl and explicitly told her she was “sexy.” Further details revealed that Taylor suggested they go for a drive together and even arranged a meeting for the upcoming Tuesday, indicating a clear intent to meet in person.
Prosecutor Tony Stanford outlined that Taylor also expressed a desire for physical intimacy, stating he wanted the girl to “snog him” and describing a scenario where he wanted to “put her up against a wall and do things to her.” Concerns about the girl’s safety and the nature of her online interactions prompted authorities to scrutinize her Facebook page.
The investigation confirmed Taylor’s inappropriate conduct and his attempt to meet the girl for sexual purposes.
During the court proceedings, Graham Huston, representing Taylor, highlighted that a probation report recommended the necessity of a sexual rehabilitation course, emphasizing the importance of addressing Taylor’s behavior.
It was also noted that Taylor had no prior criminal convictions.
The court was informed that Taylor is now married and currently resides in Swindon, Wiltshire.
In court, Taylor admitted to a single charge of attempting to meet a child following sexual grooming.
Judge Simon Hirst, presiding over the case, considered the appropriate sentence.
He offered Taylor the choice between a short custodial sentence or a community order.
Ultimately, the judge decided on a community order, believing it would serve the public interest better and provide an opportunity for rehabilitation.
Judge Hirst remarked that Taylor’s actions had resulted in the loss of his good character and career, but emphasized that a community order was the more constructive option in this case.
As part of his sentence, Taylor was ordered to register as a sex offender for five years, complete a sex offenders rehabilitation course, and was placed on probation for three years.
The case underscores the ongoing efforts of law enforcement and judicial authorities to combat online grooming and protect minors from exploitation.
