DAVID POMPHRET'S BRUTAL MURDER OF WIFE IN WARRINGTON STABLES LEADS TO LIFE SENTENCE
| Red Rose Database
Warrington Domestic Homicide
In a tragic and violent incident that shocked the community of Warrington, David Pomphret was found guilty of the heinous murder of his wife, Ann Marie Pomphret, at their private stables. The devastating event unfolded on the evening of November 2nd, when a heated argument escalated into a brutal attack that would ultimately end Ann Marie’s life.
Ann Marie, who was 49 years old at the time, became the victim of a savage assault involving a crowbar. Witnesses and evidence revealed that she was struck approximately 30 times during the confrontation, which took place within the confines of their Warrington property. The court heard that the attack was not a spontaneous act of violence but was preceded by a period of intense conflict between the couple.
David Pomphret, aged 51, initially admitted to the killing, claiming that he acted during a temporary loss of control. He argued that his wife’s volatile and unpredictable behavior justified his actions, a defense that the court carefully considered. However, the evidence presented painted a different picture. A bloodstained sock, which Pomphret was caught with, was linked directly to the scene of the crime, undermining his claims of accidental or uncontrollable violence.
The presiding judge did not accept Pomphret’s defense, describing him as an “accomplished liar” who had woven “a web of deceit and lies” throughout the proceedings. The judge stated, “You had had enough of her, saw the opportunity that presented itself that night to kill her and did so.” The court also examined the defensive injuries sustained by Ann Marie, which indicated she was pleading and begging for her life as she was attacked. This evidence suggested that the killing was not solely the result of a momentary loss of temper but involved elements of premeditation.
Further investigation revealed that Pomphret attempted to cover his tracks meticulously. Despite his efforts, he was re-arrested after police discovered airborne blood on his socks, which he failed to change. Under pressure, Pomphret eventually admitted to manslaughter but again blamed his wife’s perceived volatile nature for provoking the attack. The court concluded that his attempt to conceal evidence was ultimately unsuccessful, leading to his conviction for murder.
In sentencing, the judge handed down a life imprisonment sentence with a minimum term of 20 years. The case has left a lasting scar on the Warrington community, highlighting the tragic consequences of domestic violence and the devastating impact of unchecked anger and deceit.
Ann Marie, who was 49 years old at the time, became the victim of a savage assault involving a crowbar. Witnesses and evidence revealed that she was struck approximately 30 times during the confrontation, which took place within the confines of their Warrington property. The court heard that the attack was not a spontaneous act of violence but was preceded by a period of intense conflict between the couple.
David Pomphret, aged 51, initially admitted to the killing, claiming that he acted during a temporary loss of control. He argued that his wife’s volatile and unpredictable behavior justified his actions, a defense that the court carefully considered. However, the evidence presented painted a different picture. A bloodstained sock, which Pomphret was caught with, was linked directly to the scene of the crime, undermining his claims of accidental or uncontrollable violence.
The presiding judge did not accept Pomphret’s defense, describing him as an “accomplished liar” who had woven “a web of deceit and lies” throughout the proceedings. The judge stated, “You had had enough of her, saw the opportunity that presented itself that night to kill her and did so.” The court also examined the defensive injuries sustained by Ann Marie, which indicated she was pleading and begging for her life as she was attacked. This evidence suggested that the killing was not solely the result of a momentary loss of temper but involved elements of premeditation.
Further investigation revealed that Pomphret attempted to cover his tracks meticulously. Despite his efforts, he was re-arrested after police discovered airborne blood on his socks, which he failed to change. Under pressure, Pomphret eventually admitted to manslaughter but again blamed his wife’s perceived volatile nature for provoking the attack. The court concluded that his attempt to conceal evidence was ultimately unsuccessful, leading to his conviction for murder.
In sentencing, the judge handed down a life imprisonment sentence with a minimum term of 20 years. The case has left a lasting scar on the Warrington community, highlighting the tragic consequences of domestic violence and the devastating impact of unchecked anger and deceit.