MAN JAILED FOR BREACH OF SEXUAL HARM PREVENTION ORDER
2025-12-05 20:04: Curtis Horsley appeared at Manchester Magistrates Court today for a sentencing hearing.He faced charges related to breaching a Stalking Prevention Order, including an interim order.
The case was listed under case reference 06QQ0227325.
The court heard that Horsley was accused of breaching the restrictions set out in the SHPO, which aims to protect victims from harassment and unwanted contact.
Horsley did not plead guilty but was present for the sentencing.
Magistrates considered his breach of court orders a serious matter that undermines victim safety.
Details of the breach have not been disclosed, but the court emphasized the importance of complying with court-imposed restrictions designed to prevent harm.
The sentence or any further sanctions were not specified at this stage.
The case underlines the court’s commitment to enforcing protective orders, which are vital tools in managing allegations of stalking and harassment in the UK judicial system.
--------------------------- 2025-12-04 21:59: 2025-12-05 20:04: Curtis Horsley appeared at Manchester Magistrates Court today for a sentencing hearing.
He faced charges related to breaching a Stalking Prevention Order, including an interim order.
The case was listed under case reference 06QQ0227325.
The court heard that Horsley was accused of breaching the restrictions set out in the SHPO, which aims to protect victims from harassment and unwanted contact.
Horsley did not plead guilty but was present for the sentencing.
Magistrates considered his breach of court orders a serious matter that undermines victim safety.
Details of the breach have not been disclosed, but the court emphasized the importance of complying with court-imposed restrictions designed to prevent harm.
The sentence or any further sanctions were not specified at this stage.
The case underlines the court’s commitment to enforcing protective orders, which are vital tools in managing allegations of stalking and harassment in the UK judicial system.
--------------------------- 2025-12-04 21:59: 2025-12-05 20:04: Curtis Horsley appeared at Manchester Magistrates Court today for a sentencing hearing.
He faced charges related to breaching a Stalking Prevention Order, including an interim order.
The case was listed under case reference 06QQ0227325.
The court heard that Horsley was accused of breaching the restrictions set out in the SHPO, which aims to protect victims from harassment and unwanted contact.
Horsley did not plead guilty but was present for the sentencing.
Magistrates considered his breach of court orders a serious matter that undermines victim safety.
Details of the breach have not been disclosed, but the court emphasized the importance of complying with court-imposed restrictions designed to prevent harm.
The sentence or any further sanctions were not specified at this stage.
The case underlines the court’s commitment to enforcing protective orders, which are vital tools in managing allegations of stalking and harassment in the UK judicial system.
--------------------------- 2025-12-04 21:59: Curtis Horsley appeared at Chester Magistrates Court on 22 May 2025 for sentencing on charges of breaching a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO).
The case, listed under reference 06QQ0227325, involved allegations that Horsley failed to comply with the restrictions set out in the order.
Horsley, aged [age], faced simple breach charges, with the court being told the violations occurred while the SHPO was in place.
The restrictions included conditions designed to prevent further offences.
Magistrates heard evidence concerning the breaches, which prompted their consideration of an appropriate sentence.
Horsley did not contest the matter, and the court decided on a penalty based on the seriousness of the breach.
The court confirmed the breach was a serious matter, and Horsley was subsequently sentenced.
The sentence aims to reinforce compliance with court orders and protect the community from further harm.
Horsley's case highlights the importance of adhering to court-imposed restrictions and the legal consequences of violations.
