CHE COMERASAMY FROM CHELMSFORD CAUGHT WITH CHILD INDECENT IMAGES AT LOCAL STORE
In a disturbing case that has shocked the community of Chelmsford, a 20-year-old student named Che Comerasamy, residing on Aubrey Close, was caught in possession of indecent images of children.The incident unfolded on April 5 of the previous year when Comerasamy-Bryers visited a local CeX store with the intention of selling his Sony mobile phone.
He claimed that the device was not functioning properly, prompting the store staff to examine it.
During the inspection, the staff discovered a troubling cache of 179 photographs depicting child abuse.
This discovery prompted immediate concern and subsequent police involvement.
Further investigations revealed that Comerasamy-Bryers was not only in possession of these images but also had additional illicit material stored on two laptops found at his residence.
Prosecutor Marc Brown outlined these findings during a hearing at Chelmsford Crown Court on Thursday, May 18.
According to the evidence presented, the images and videos included at least one photograph of a baby girl, with the remaining material depicting children aged between six and thirteen.
The material also contained disturbing images of children with animals, highlighting the severity and depravity of the content involved.
Comerasamy-Bryers, a university student, admitted to six charges related to creating or downloading indecent images of children, with the earliest of these acts occurring on or before April 6 of the previous year.
He also pleaded guilty to two counts of possessing indecent images of children.
The court heard that the material was of a highly inappropriate and illegal nature, warranting serious legal consequences.
In sentencing, Recorder Karim Khalil QC imposed a series of penalties aimed at both punishment and rehabilitation.
Comerasamy-Bryers was ordered to complete 40 days of rehabilitation, perform 250 hours of unpaid community service, and pay a fine of £200.
Additionally, he was placed under a three-year community order and mandated to participate in an internet sex offending treatment programme.
Furthermore, a sexual harm prevention order was issued for a period of five years.
This order explicitly prohibits Comerasamy-Bryers from deleting his internet browsing history, ensuring ongoing monitoring of his online activity.
During the sentencing, Recorder Khalil emphasized the importance of a long-term community-based approach, stating, “A long and intrusive period of a community order is required to punish and seek your rehabilitation.” The case underscores the serious nature of online child exploitation and the legal system’s commitment to addressing such offenses with appropriate severity.
