CAREFUL PAEDOPHILE CARL LAWS FROM GOOLE ESCAPES PRISON AFTER SCOTLAND SEX OFFENCES
| Red Rose Database
Goole Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has sent shockwaves through the community of Goole, 21-year-old Carl Laws, a man with a disturbing history of sexual misconduct, was handed a lenient sentence despite the severity of his crimes involving a 13-year-old girl from Fife, Scotland. Laws, who has been identified as a social misfit with a troubling past, appeared before Hull Crown Court in January 2014 to face charges related to the exploitation of a minor and possession of indecent images.
According to court records, Laws was involved in inciting a young girl, eight years his junior, to perform gross sexual acts on herself using household objects. These acts were carried out in Scotland, but the investigation revealed that Laws had been actively grooming her through online communications. The court heard that Laws had collected a significant number of illicit images—285 in total—on his Blackberry mobile phone and Samsung laptop. These images, which depicted the girl in various states of undress, were stored under the file name “birds,” highlighting the depravity of his actions.
Prosecutors detailed that Laws had initially pretended to be a 15-year-old boy and later claimed to be 14 while engaging with the girl via webcam. His online activities were part of a broader pattern of grooming, with authorities estimating that up to 100 men across the country may have been involved in inciting the girl between June 21 and September 11, 2012. The case was brought to light after Fife police received complaints that the girl had been manipulated into sexual activities by multiple men.
During the court proceedings, Crown barrister Phillip Evans emphasized the gravity of Laws’ offences, noting that the guidelines for such crimes typically range from three to seven years in prison. He explained that Laws’ actions were part of a disturbing network of online grooming, which posed a significant risk to young girls. The police investigation revealed that Laws had attempted to shift blame onto his nephew when questioned, but authorities quickly eliminated the nephew from suspicion.
Defense lawyer Pamela Coxon described Laws as a socially isolated and socially inept individual, noting that he was a churchgoer who was struggling with internal issues. She acknowledged that Laws did not initially admit his guilt and had cast suspicion elsewhere, which only worsened his situation. Coxon argued that Laws was in desperate need of psychological help and emphasized that his offending was carried out remotely via the internet from Goole, with no evidence of physical contact.
Judge Simon Jack, presiding over the case, expressed his serious concerns about Laws’ conduct but also acknowledged his lack of prior criminal history. After careful consideration, the judge decided to impose a two-year prison sentence, suspended for two years, along with a community order requiring Laws to participate in a sex offender treatment program and complete 200 hours of unpaid work. Additionally, Laws was placed under a 10-year Sexual Offences Prevention Order, mandated to sign the sex offenders’ register for the same period, and was ordered to comply with other restrictions aimed at protecting the public.
Judge Jack highlighted the importance of intervention and rehabilitation, warning that without proper help, Laws might reoffend. The case underscores the ongoing dangers posed by online grooming and the need for vigilant law enforcement and community awareness to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
According to court records, Laws was involved in inciting a young girl, eight years his junior, to perform gross sexual acts on herself using household objects. These acts were carried out in Scotland, but the investigation revealed that Laws had been actively grooming her through online communications. The court heard that Laws had collected a significant number of illicit images—285 in total—on his Blackberry mobile phone and Samsung laptop. These images, which depicted the girl in various states of undress, were stored under the file name “birds,” highlighting the depravity of his actions.
Prosecutors detailed that Laws had initially pretended to be a 15-year-old boy and later claimed to be 14 while engaging with the girl via webcam. His online activities were part of a broader pattern of grooming, with authorities estimating that up to 100 men across the country may have been involved in inciting the girl between June 21 and September 11, 2012. The case was brought to light after Fife police received complaints that the girl had been manipulated into sexual activities by multiple men.
During the court proceedings, Crown barrister Phillip Evans emphasized the gravity of Laws’ offences, noting that the guidelines for such crimes typically range from three to seven years in prison. He explained that Laws’ actions were part of a disturbing network of online grooming, which posed a significant risk to young girls. The police investigation revealed that Laws had attempted to shift blame onto his nephew when questioned, but authorities quickly eliminated the nephew from suspicion.
Defense lawyer Pamela Coxon described Laws as a socially isolated and socially inept individual, noting that he was a churchgoer who was struggling with internal issues. She acknowledged that Laws did not initially admit his guilt and had cast suspicion elsewhere, which only worsened his situation. Coxon argued that Laws was in desperate need of psychological help and emphasized that his offending was carried out remotely via the internet from Goole, with no evidence of physical contact.
Judge Simon Jack, presiding over the case, expressed his serious concerns about Laws’ conduct but also acknowledged his lack of prior criminal history. After careful consideration, the judge decided to impose a two-year prison sentence, suspended for two years, along with a community order requiring Laws to participate in a sex offender treatment program and complete 200 hours of unpaid work. Additionally, Laws was placed under a 10-year Sexual Offences Prevention Order, mandated to sign the sex offenders’ register for the same period, and was ordered to comply with other restrictions aimed at protecting the public.
Judge Jack highlighted the importance of intervention and rehabilitation, warning that without proper help, Laws might reoffend. The case underscores the ongoing dangers posed by online grooming and the need for vigilant law enforcement and community awareness to prevent similar tragedies in the future.