BRIDGET COLE AND PETER GRANT HORRIFICALLY TORTURE RABBIT IN CHATTERIS AND MARCH, CAMBRIDGESHIRE
| Red Rose Database
Chatteris / March, Cambridgeshire Animal Abuser
In a disturbing case that has shocked the local communities of Chatteris and March in Cambridgeshire, two individuals, Bridget Louise Cole and Peter John Grant, were found guilty of heinous animal cruelty involving a defenseless rabbit named Lucky.
Bridget Cole, who has previously been associated with Debden Green, Ely, and more recently resided at Whitemill Road, Chatteris PE16 6PG, was identified as a charity worker and a former cub scout leader. Her involvement in the brutal treatment of Lucky was documented during the court proceedings, revealing a series of shocking acts of cruelty. Witnesses described how Cole laughed as she dunked the rabbit into a mixture of bleach and water, a cruel act intended to cause suffering. She also struck Lucky repeatedly with a metal pole, displaying a complete lack of remorse for her actions.
The court was shown evidence that Cole had also burned the rabbit with a cigarette lighter during what was described as a sick party. Her behavior and attitude during the trial suggested a disturbing disregard for animal welfare, which did not sit well with the court. Despite her claims that she was attempting to save Lucky from the actions of others, her denial of cruelty charges was dismissed, especially given her apparent lack of remorse.
Peter Grant, who was tried separately from Cole, was implicated in the final act of Lucky’s suffering. He admitted to ending the rabbit’s torment by bludgeoning him to death with a glass bottle. Grant claimed that he had nothing to do with the initial acts of cruelty involving the bleach and water, asserting that his action was an attempt to put Lucky out of his misery. However, the court found his explanation unconvincing and his involvement in the animal’s suffering undeniable.
Following the trial, the court handed down sentences that reflected the severity of the crimes. Bridget Cole received a two-month prison sentence suspended for a period, along with a fine of £1,500 to cover court costs. Additionally, she was banned from keeping any animals for a period of 25 years, a ban that will expire in 2030. Peter Grant was sentenced to 100 hours of community service and ordered to pay £300 in costs. He was also given a five-year ban from keeping animals, which had already expired in 2010.
This case has sparked outrage among animal welfare advocates and the local community, highlighting the importance of strict enforcement of animal cruelty laws and the need for ongoing vigilance to prevent such horrific acts from occurring again.
Bridget Cole, who has previously been associated with Debden Green, Ely, and more recently resided at Whitemill Road, Chatteris PE16 6PG, was identified as a charity worker and a former cub scout leader. Her involvement in the brutal treatment of Lucky was documented during the court proceedings, revealing a series of shocking acts of cruelty. Witnesses described how Cole laughed as she dunked the rabbit into a mixture of bleach and water, a cruel act intended to cause suffering. She also struck Lucky repeatedly with a metal pole, displaying a complete lack of remorse for her actions.
The court was shown evidence that Cole had also burned the rabbit with a cigarette lighter during what was described as a sick party. Her behavior and attitude during the trial suggested a disturbing disregard for animal welfare, which did not sit well with the court. Despite her claims that she was attempting to save Lucky from the actions of others, her denial of cruelty charges was dismissed, especially given her apparent lack of remorse.
Peter Grant, who was tried separately from Cole, was implicated in the final act of Lucky’s suffering. He admitted to ending the rabbit’s torment by bludgeoning him to death with a glass bottle. Grant claimed that he had nothing to do with the initial acts of cruelty involving the bleach and water, asserting that his action was an attempt to put Lucky out of his misery. However, the court found his explanation unconvincing and his involvement in the animal’s suffering undeniable.
Following the trial, the court handed down sentences that reflected the severity of the crimes. Bridget Cole received a two-month prison sentence suspended for a period, along with a fine of £1,500 to cover court costs. Additionally, she was banned from keeping any animals for a period of 25 years, a ban that will expire in 2030. Peter Grant was sentenced to 100 hours of community service and ordered to pay £300 in costs. He was also given a five-year ban from keeping animals, which had already expired in 2010.
This case has sparked outrage among animal welfare advocates and the local community, highlighting the importance of strict enforcement of animal cruelty laws and the need for ongoing vigilance to prevent such horrific acts from occurring again.