ANDREW HARGREAVES FROM BLACKPOOL ESCAPES JAIL AFTER CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OFFENSES
| Red Rose Database
Blackpool Sexual Abuser
In July 2003, a man from Blackpool, identified as Andrew Hargreaves, faced serious allegations related to the possession and creation of indecent images of children. The court proceedings revealed that Hargreaves, aged 23 and residing in Roseacre, South Shore, Blackpool, had accumulated a total of 600 pornographic images depicting minors on his personal computer.
The Blackpool magistrates heard that Hargreaves had begun viewing internet-based child pornography as early as 1999, a period during which he was reportedly battling depression. This detail was brought up during the hearing to provide context for his actions, although it did not serve as a legal justification.
His defense team argued that Hargreaves was unaware that possessing such material was illegal, a point that the court considered in its sentencing decision. District Judge Paul Firth acknowledged Hargreaves' personal circumstances, including his role as a caregiver to his elderly parents, which influenced the court's judgment.
Despite the serious nature of the offenses, Hargreaves was not sentenced to prison. Instead, he received a three-year rehabilitation order aimed at addressing his behavior and preventing future offenses. Additionally, he was ordered to pay £80 in court costs. As part of his sentence, Hargreaves was also placed on the sex offenders' register for a period of five years.
The case highlights the ongoing efforts of the legal system to balance punishment with rehabilitation, especially in cases involving possession of illegal material related to minors. The court's decision reflects a consideration of both the severity of the crimes and the personal circumstances of the defendant.
The Blackpool magistrates heard that Hargreaves had begun viewing internet-based child pornography as early as 1999, a period during which he was reportedly battling depression. This detail was brought up during the hearing to provide context for his actions, although it did not serve as a legal justification.
His defense team argued that Hargreaves was unaware that possessing such material was illegal, a point that the court considered in its sentencing decision. District Judge Paul Firth acknowledged Hargreaves' personal circumstances, including his role as a caregiver to his elderly parents, which influenced the court's judgment.
Despite the serious nature of the offenses, Hargreaves was not sentenced to prison. Instead, he received a three-year rehabilitation order aimed at addressing his behavior and preventing future offenses. Additionally, he was ordered to pay £80 in court costs. As part of his sentence, Hargreaves was also placed on the sex offenders' register for a period of five years.
The case highlights the ongoing efforts of the legal system to balance punishment with rehabilitation, especially in cases involving possession of illegal material related to minors. The court's decision reflects a consideration of both the severity of the crimes and the personal circumstances of the defendant.