ALISTER MOLLISON CAUGHT WITH HORRIFIC ANIMAL PORN IN WASHINGTON
| Red Rose Database
Washington Sexual Abuser
In October 2012, a disturbing case emerged involving a pensioner from Washington who was found in possession of an extensive collection of illegal and highly disturbing animal pornography. The individual, identified as 67-year-old Alister Mollison, was discovered to have accumulated over 600 illicit films depicting heinous acts involving various animals.
Authorities from Northumbria Police executed a search warrant at Mollison’s former residence located in Collingwood Court, Sulgrave. The operation took place on March 8, and during the raid, detectives from the Hi-Tech Crime Unit seized a significant quantity of digital media and recording equipment. The investigation revealed that Mollison owned a staggering total of 1,468 movies, of which 661 were classified as extreme pornography involving bestiality. The explicit content included acts with dogs, cats, horses, ponies, pigs, donkeys, goats, eels, and fish, highlighting the disturbing breadth of his collection.
Following the discovery, Mollison was taken into custody. He expressed remorse for his actions and indicated a willingness to surrender the material to authorities. Prosecutor Rachael Dodsworth, presenting the case at Sunderland Magistrates’ Court, detailed the findings and the nature of the material seized. She emphasized the severity of the content, which depicted depraved sexual acts with animals, and noted that the police had acted swiftly to investigate the matter.
Mollison, originally from Scotland, was charged with possession of extreme pornography. During the proceedings, he pleaded guilty to the charges. His defense solicitor, Gerry Armstrong, provided context about Mollison’s personal circumstances, explaining that he had been living alone for several years following the breakdown of his marriage. Mr. Armstrong also highlighted that Mollison had been unable to work due to health issues and had struggled with depression and alcohol problems.
He further described Mollison as a solitary individual who had worked diligently in the chemical industry throughout his life. The solicitor suggested that the illicit material had likely been in Mollison’s possession for at least 15 years and that there was no evidence to suggest he had downloaded the content from the internet or shared it with others. Mr. Armstrong expressed the view that the police’s discovery might serve as a form of intervention, emphasizing that Mollison was more to be pitied than punished, given his isolation and lack of social connections.
In sentencing, the chairman of the magistrates’ bench, Mr. Richardson, acknowledged the disturbing nature of the case and the defendant’s lonely lifestyle. He decided to impose a 12-month community order with supervision, along with a financial penalty of £85 to cover costs. The magistrates expressed concern about Mollison’s well-being and hoped that the Probation Service could provide him with the necessary support to address his personal issues. The court’s decision reflected a recognition of the seriousness of the offense while also considering Mollison’s circumstances and the potential for rehabilitation.
Authorities from Northumbria Police executed a search warrant at Mollison’s former residence located in Collingwood Court, Sulgrave. The operation took place on March 8, and during the raid, detectives from the Hi-Tech Crime Unit seized a significant quantity of digital media and recording equipment. The investigation revealed that Mollison owned a staggering total of 1,468 movies, of which 661 were classified as extreme pornography involving bestiality. The explicit content included acts with dogs, cats, horses, ponies, pigs, donkeys, goats, eels, and fish, highlighting the disturbing breadth of his collection.
Following the discovery, Mollison was taken into custody. He expressed remorse for his actions and indicated a willingness to surrender the material to authorities. Prosecutor Rachael Dodsworth, presenting the case at Sunderland Magistrates’ Court, detailed the findings and the nature of the material seized. She emphasized the severity of the content, which depicted depraved sexual acts with animals, and noted that the police had acted swiftly to investigate the matter.
Mollison, originally from Scotland, was charged with possession of extreme pornography. During the proceedings, he pleaded guilty to the charges. His defense solicitor, Gerry Armstrong, provided context about Mollison’s personal circumstances, explaining that he had been living alone for several years following the breakdown of his marriage. Mr. Armstrong also highlighted that Mollison had been unable to work due to health issues and had struggled with depression and alcohol problems.
He further described Mollison as a solitary individual who had worked diligently in the chemical industry throughout his life. The solicitor suggested that the illicit material had likely been in Mollison’s possession for at least 15 years and that there was no evidence to suggest he had downloaded the content from the internet or shared it with others. Mr. Armstrong expressed the view that the police’s discovery might serve as a form of intervention, emphasizing that Mollison was more to be pitied than punished, given his isolation and lack of social connections.
In sentencing, the chairman of the magistrates’ bench, Mr. Richardson, acknowledged the disturbing nature of the case and the defendant’s lonely lifestyle. He decided to impose a 12-month community order with supervision, along with a financial penalty of £85 to cover costs. The magistrates expressed concern about Mollison’s well-being and hoped that the Probation Service could provide him with the necessary support to address his personal issues. The court’s decision reflected a recognition of the seriousness of the offense while also considering Mollison’s circumstances and the potential for rehabilitation.