ALISTAIR JONES FROM MOLD SENTENCED FOR ONLINE CHILD SEX OFFENCES IN SHOCKING CASE
| Red Rose Database
Mold Child Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has shocked the community of Mold, a man named Alistair Jones, aged 47, has been sentenced to a prison term after engaging in highly inappropriate and illegal online activities involving what he believed was a 13-year-old girl. The incident came to light during an undercover police operation, revealing the extent of Jones's disturbing behavior.
Jones, who resides at St David’s House on High Street in Mold, was found to have been communicating with a person he thought was a young girl through various social media platforms, including WhatsApp and a teen chat website, during February of this year. His messages were explicit and aimed at soliciting sexual images, as he asked the girl to send him nude photographs of herself. In return, he sent indecent images of himself, accompanied by messages such as “love to see you babes” and inquiries about whether she liked older men. These exchanges were part of a series of conversations that spanned several weeks.
Unbeknownst to Jones, the individual he was communicating with was not a young girl but an undercover police officer working as part of an operation designed to catch predators seeking to exploit children online. The police had set up the sting to identify and apprehend individuals engaging in such illegal activities. Jones was charged with multiple offenses, including two counts of attempting to incite a 13-year-old girl to engage in sexual activity by sending indecent images of himself on February 13 and February 27. Additionally, he admitted to attempting to engage in sexual communication with a minor by sending sexually explicit messages between February 6 and 28, and to two counts of attempting to cause a 13-year-old girl to view indecent images of him engaging in sexual acts on February 9 and February 27.
Prosecutor Karl Scholz explained that police officers visited Jones in April, during which they seized his mobile phone and laptop. These devices revealed a clear sexual interest in young girls, further confirming the suspicions of the authorities. During questioning, Jones claimed he believed the person he was chatting with was 16 years old, but it was pointed out that the individual had initially provided her age as 13, indicating his awareness of the potential risk.
Judge Rhys Rowlands presided over the case at Mold Crown Court and described Jones’s conduct as “disgusting and worrying.” The judge emphasized the severity of the offenses, stating that such behavior warranted a custodial sentence. He remarked, “You were engaging in lurid sexual conversation with who you believed to be a child aged 13 years old, but she didn’t exist, and you were communicating with a police officer.”
In addition to the prison sentence, Jones was subjected to a seven-year sexual harm prevention order and was ordered to register as a sex offender for the same period. He is also prohibited from working with vulnerable adults and children. Furthermore, his electronic devices, including his laptop and phone, are to be destroyed to prevent any further misuse. The court’s actions reflect the seriousness with which such offenses are regarded, especially given the potential harm to children and the importance of safeguarding vulnerable individuals in society.
Jones, who resides at St David’s House on High Street in Mold, was found to have been communicating with a person he thought was a young girl through various social media platforms, including WhatsApp and a teen chat website, during February of this year. His messages were explicit and aimed at soliciting sexual images, as he asked the girl to send him nude photographs of herself. In return, he sent indecent images of himself, accompanied by messages such as “love to see you babes” and inquiries about whether she liked older men. These exchanges were part of a series of conversations that spanned several weeks.
Unbeknownst to Jones, the individual he was communicating with was not a young girl but an undercover police officer working as part of an operation designed to catch predators seeking to exploit children online. The police had set up the sting to identify and apprehend individuals engaging in such illegal activities. Jones was charged with multiple offenses, including two counts of attempting to incite a 13-year-old girl to engage in sexual activity by sending indecent images of himself on February 13 and February 27. Additionally, he admitted to attempting to engage in sexual communication with a minor by sending sexually explicit messages between February 6 and 28, and to two counts of attempting to cause a 13-year-old girl to view indecent images of him engaging in sexual acts on February 9 and February 27.
Prosecutor Karl Scholz explained that police officers visited Jones in April, during which they seized his mobile phone and laptop. These devices revealed a clear sexual interest in young girls, further confirming the suspicions of the authorities. During questioning, Jones claimed he believed the person he was chatting with was 16 years old, but it was pointed out that the individual had initially provided her age as 13, indicating his awareness of the potential risk.
Judge Rhys Rowlands presided over the case at Mold Crown Court and described Jones’s conduct as “disgusting and worrying.” The judge emphasized the severity of the offenses, stating that such behavior warranted a custodial sentence. He remarked, “You were engaging in lurid sexual conversation with who you believed to be a child aged 13 years old, but she didn’t exist, and you were communicating with a police officer.”
In addition to the prison sentence, Jones was subjected to a seven-year sexual harm prevention order and was ordered to register as a sex offender for the same period. He is also prohibited from working with vulnerable adults and children. Furthermore, his electronic devices, including his laptop and phone, are to be destroyed to prevent any further misuse. The court’s actions reflect the seriousness with which such offenses are regarded, especially given the potential harm to children and the importance of safeguarding vulnerable individuals in society.