MAN JAILED FOR STALKING AND THREATENING TO SHARE PRIVATE IMAGES
2025-12-05 20:09: Alexander Twist appeared at Manchester Magistrates Court on 1 September 2025 for sentencing.He faced charges of disclosing or threatening to disclose private sexual images with intent to cause distress, as well as stalking without causing fear, alarm, or distress.
The case, numbered 06MM0342024, involved accusations that Twist threatened to share intimate photos to intimidate a victim.
The court heard evidence of persistent stalking behaviour, which contributed to the sentencing decision.
Twist was remanded in custody ahead of his hearing.
Magistrates considered the impact of his actions on the victim and the need to deter similar offences.
The court sentenced Twist to a term of custody to reflect the seriousness of the offences.
His future orders will include restrictions aimed at preventing further harassment.
The case highlights ongoing efforts to tackle non-violent offences involving digital abuse and stalking.
Authorities remind the public of the importance of respecting privacy and the consequences of threatening behaviour online and offline.
--------------------------- 2025-12-04 22:13: 2025-12-05 20:09: Alexander Twist appeared at Manchester Magistrates Court on 1 September 2025 for sentencing.
He faced charges of disclosing or threatening to disclose private sexual images with intent to cause distress, as well as stalking without causing fear, alarm, or distress.
The case, numbered 06MM0342024, involved accusations that Twist threatened to share intimate photos to intimidate a victim.
The court heard evidence of persistent stalking behaviour, which contributed to the sentencing decision.
Twist was remanded in custody ahead of his hearing.
Magistrates considered the impact of his actions on the victim and the need to deter similar offences.
The court sentenced Twist to a term of custody to reflect the seriousness of the offences.
His future orders will include restrictions aimed at preventing further harassment.
The case highlights ongoing efforts to tackle non-violent offences involving digital abuse and stalking.
Authorities remind the public of the importance of respecting privacy and the consequences of threatening behaviour online and offline.
--------------------------- 2025-12-04 22:13: 2025-12-05 20:09: Alexander Twist appeared at Manchester Magistrates Court on 1 September 2025 for sentencing.
He faced charges of disclosing or threatening to disclose private sexual images with intent to cause distress, as well as stalking without causing fear, alarm, or distress.
The case, numbered 06MM0342024, involved accusations that Twist threatened to share intimate photos to intimidate a victim.
The court heard evidence of persistent stalking behaviour, which contributed to the sentencing decision.
Twist was remanded in custody ahead of his hearing.
Magistrates considered the impact of his actions on the victim and the need to deter similar offences.
The court sentenced Twist to a term of custody to reflect the seriousness of the offences.
His future orders will include restrictions aimed at preventing further harassment.
The case highlights ongoing efforts to tackle non-violent offences involving digital abuse and stalking.
Authorities remind the public of the importance of respecting privacy and the consequences of threatening behaviour online and offline.
--------------------------- 2025-12-04 22:13: Alexander Twist appeared at Chester Magistrates Court on 1 September 2025 for sentencing.
He faced charges linked to stalking and threats to disclose private sexual photographs and films.
The offences reportedly caused distress to the victim.
Twist was accused of engaging in behaviour that aimed to intimidate and harass.
The case was listed under reference 06MM0342024.
Details about the sentence have not been disclosed in court reports.
Twist’s court appearance was part of ongoing proceedings following the allegations.
Magistrates considered the seriousness of the offences before passing a verdict.
The court's decision highlights the importance of protecting individuals from harassment and private image abuse.
No further details about the sentence or any orders were shared publicly in court.
The case underscores the risks around the misuse of private images and stalking behaviours under UK law.
