ALEXANDER ROSSI CAUGHT IN ESSEX AND LONDON PUBLIC TOILETS FOR PREDATORY BEHAVIOR
| Red Rose Database
London Essex Child Sexual Abuser
In January 2009, a disturbing case emerged involving Alexander Rossi, an 85-year-old pensioner with a troubling history of inappropriate behavior towards young boys. Rossi was frequently observed in the crypts of St Paul’s Cathedral, a renowned tourist landmark located in London, where he would follow young boys into the toilets with suspicious intent. His actions prompted concern among staff and visitors alike, leading to his eventual arrest after months of covert surveillance.
Rossi, residing on St Barnabas Road in Woodford Green, Essex, had a long-standing record of sexual misconduct. Decades earlier, he was convicted for exposing himself to two young girls 46 years prior, and in 1998, he was caught performing a sex act on himself aboard a train. Despite these past convictions, Rossi claimed that his ill health was a mitigating factor, asserting that he was innocent of any malicious intent during his recent conduct.
The police were alerted after the Canon’s Verger at St Paul’s Cathedral noticed Rossi’s suspicious behavior. Recognizing him as a regular visitor, staff observed Rossi following a young boy into the male toilets. This prompted the authorities to intervene, and Rossi was detained. Evidence collected by plainclothes officers revealed that Rossi had been sitting outside a gift shop near the cathedral, with his gaze fixed intently on the toilets. When a teenage boy appeared, Rossi followed him inside. Prosecutor Henrietta Paget described how Rossi’s attention then shifted to a 10-year-old, and he proceeded to commit a sexual act in front of the child.
During the trial at Southwark Crown Court in London, Rossi maintained that he had done nothing wrong. He claimed that his visits to the crypts were solely because his late wife enjoyed sitting there, and he insisted he was not intentionally following young boys into the toilets. Rossi also cited prostate problems as a reason for his frequent visits to the restroom, suggesting that he could not have been physically aroused as the police had alleged.
However, the prosecution dismissed his claims, emphasizing that Rossi’s behavior was clearly predatory. The court heard that Rossi’s pattern of visits to the cathedral crypts over several months had made him recognizable to staff, including the Canon’s Verger, who had repeatedly observed him following young boys into the toilets. The evidence pointed to a calculated pattern of behavior aimed at exploiting vulnerable children.
Judge Stephen Robbins, delivering the sentence, acknowledged Rossi’s age and health issues but emphasized the need for public protection. He sentenced Rossi to a 12-month community order on each of the three counts—two counts of voyeurism and one count of engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child. The sentences were to run consecutively. Additionally, Rossi was ordered not to use public toilets except in private cubicles with the door closed, and only for necessary purposes such as washing and drying his hands. He was also placed under a 12-month supervision order to monitor his conduct.
This case highlights the ongoing concerns about safeguarding children in public spaces and the importance of vigilance by staff and authorities to prevent predatory behavior, especially from individuals with a known history of sexual offenses.
Rossi, residing on St Barnabas Road in Woodford Green, Essex, had a long-standing record of sexual misconduct. Decades earlier, he was convicted for exposing himself to two young girls 46 years prior, and in 1998, he was caught performing a sex act on himself aboard a train. Despite these past convictions, Rossi claimed that his ill health was a mitigating factor, asserting that he was innocent of any malicious intent during his recent conduct.
The police were alerted after the Canon’s Verger at St Paul’s Cathedral noticed Rossi’s suspicious behavior. Recognizing him as a regular visitor, staff observed Rossi following a young boy into the male toilets. This prompted the authorities to intervene, and Rossi was detained. Evidence collected by plainclothes officers revealed that Rossi had been sitting outside a gift shop near the cathedral, with his gaze fixed intently on the toilets. When a teenage boy appeared, Rossi followed him inside. Prosecutor Henrietta Paget described how Rossi’s attention then shifted to a 10-year-old, and he proceeded to commit a sexual act in front of the child.
During the trial at Southwark Crown Court in London, Rossi maintained that he had done nothing wrong. He claimed that his visits to the crypts were solely because his late wife enjoyed sitting there, and he insisted he was not intentionally following young boys into the toilets. Rossi also cited prostate problems as a reason for his frequent visits to the restroom, suggesting that he could not have been physically aroused as the police had alleged.
However, the prosecution dismissed his claims, emphasizing that Rossi’s behavior was clearly predatory. The court heard that Rossi’s pattern of visits to the cathedral crypts over several months had made him recognizable to staff, including the Canon’s Verger, who had repeatedly observed him following young boys into the toilets. The evidence pointed to a calculated pattern of behavior aimed at exploiting vulnerable children.
Judge Stephen Robbins, delivering the sentence, acknowledged Rossi’s age and health issues but emphasized the need for public protection. He sentenced Rossi to a 12-month community order on each of the three counts—two counts of voyeurism and one count of engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child. The sentences were to run consecutively. Additionally, Rossi was ordered not to use public toilets except in private cubicles with the door closed, and only for necessary purposes such as washing and drying his hands. He was also placed under a 12-month supervision order to monitor his conduct.
This case highlights the ongoing concerns about safeguarding children in public spaces and the importance of vigilance by staff and authorities to prevent predatory behavior, especially from individuals with a known history of sexual offenses.